![]() My comments also should be read in the context of: I have a fairly high tolerance for the presence of visible noise in photographs, just as I used to have for film grain - provided the noise is not of a very ugly kind. ![]() Some of these constraints can be sidestepped through the use of "Edit in PS as Smart Object" - though that has its own downsides. If someone's instinct was to get rid of the noise FIRST, and they did it this way, that would come at a high cost in further editability. Just needs to be re-thought a little. My comments were more about the considerations for working sequence. Yes, unless / until going into the Photoshop environment. It's just that the preceding Raw adjustments have been baked in.Ī bigger question is how and when to use it. For example, the NR can happen on a copy layer and this can be locally masked, or its tonal application restricted using Blend If, or merely turned off or deleted. So it's in effect non-destructive. I trialled the Nik system some time ago, found the workflow with LR irritating (just a personal reaction) - but don't mind so much using such tools from inside PS, whereby lots of other things then become possible TOO. This is in some ways preferable anyway IMO, compared with utilities which operate with LR directly. You just need to "edit in" PhotoShop and send a tiff file over to Photoshop, call up and run Noiseware, then save the file. Noiseware is a plugin to PhotoShop, not LR. How easy is Noiseware to use with Lightroom CC? You'll simply change it directly - "underneath" all of your other prior and subsequent settings - plus with equal ease, whatever else needs to alter as a consequence.įor example, changing your NR will probably change your sharpening Clarity maybe local adjustments, etc. If you have progressed a long way through your edit, but then think that on balance, maybe that initial NR decision was just a tad overdone - you won't be tempted to just live with that anyway, due to the time and trouble cost of going back and having to repeat multiple steps. There's much greater ease and fluidity in editing by LR native adjustments alone, so far as / as late as you can. You'd need to revert to that earlier stage, and then spin off a different, or an updated, separate file version to continue working with. So this later stage does not allow any reconsidering of picture content as put there by the BEFORE stage. In the editing of a given image, there is a stage BEFORE ever invoking such an external utility - during which time you can make and un-make live changes non-destructively, working from your camera original and then there is a stage AFTER invoking this utility - during which time you can make and un-make further corrective adjustments which are live and non-destructive in their own terms, but which are working only from the content of the separate file saved out by the utility. TLDR: unlike using LR native adjustments, this puts some constraints on your working sequence. How easy is Noiseware to use with Lightroom CC?Īny such utility, even if it is marketed as a "Plugin" to LR, is an external editor so far as Lightroom's workflow is concerned. I use Lightroom CC and am considering getting Noiseware for noise reduction.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |